Casitas Municipal Water District v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WIESE, Judge.
This case is before the court following a trial held to determine the compensation, if any, owed to plaintiff under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution for the taking of its property. In an earlier round of litigation in this case, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that operating restrictions on plaintiffs water project imposed by the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) pursuant to the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531M4 (2006), should be analyzed as a physical taking where plaintiff was required to reroute a…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Casitas Municipal Water District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Bring Back the Kern v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- Casitas Municipal Water Dist v. UsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- RUSSELL AND ELIZABETH REID FAMILY TRUST v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- United Water Conservation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023