Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Miller

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 22, 1934No. Civ. 9293PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff sued for damages resulting from an automobile collision. The defendant defaulted and plaintiff had judgment after trial for $1250. The defendant has appealed on the judgment-roll.

The sole point raised by appellant is that the complaint fails to state a cause of action. The complaint alleges that the defendant was the owner of and was operating a certain automobile, and that “the said plaintiff was riding in said automobile as a passenger therein”. Appropriate allegations covering defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s injuries followed. The appellant argues that the allegation that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alexander v. McDowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Garrison v. HoganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bias v. Ohio Farmers Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API