Glustrom v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eid
{1 With the approval of the Public Utilities Commission ("PUC"), in 2005 the Public Service Company of Colorado ("Xcel") began constructing a coal-fired electric power unit known as Comanche 8. When Xeel sought to recover a portion of its construction costs nearly four years later in a rate proceeding, Leslie Glustrom intervened. Glustrom sought to introduce testimony that Xeel acted improperly and, consequently, should not recover its costs. The PUC excluded most of her testimony, a ruling that lustrom challenged. Glustrom separately challenged the depreciation rate and the possibility that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Denver Union Stock Yard Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mississippi Power Co. v. Mississippi Public Service CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
- Mississippi Power Company, Inc. v. Mississippi Public Service CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 2015