Legal Opinion

Bresnahan v. Nugent

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Kent; Grove, J. Bill by John Bresnahan, administrator of the estate of Daniel Nugent, deceased, against Emanuel Nugent, to subject to the claims of creditors assets alleged to have been fraudulently conveyed by the decedent. From a decree dismissing the bill on demurrer, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

This cause is here upon general demurrer to complainant’s bill of complaint, an appeal having been taken from an order sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the bill.

The bill alleges that the complainant was appointed *460administrator of the estate of Daniel Nugent on July 19, 1888; that on June 10, 1890, commissioners on claims in said estate allowed claims against said estate in favor of James Nugent to the amount of $2,255.03; that prior to his death, and on March 31, 1879, the intestate conveyed, by bill of sale, to the defendant, all of his personal property in the county of Kent, and, by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bresnahan v. NugentMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Harty v. TeaganMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Brillant v. Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API