Legal Opinion

Cantarella v. Cantarella

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 11, 2011No. G042957PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IKOLA, J.

In this case, we consider whether registration of a marriage certificate was vital to the validity of a marriage under the Family Law Act (Civ. Code, former § 4000 et seq.).1

In 1991, a judge conducted a marriage ceremony for Joseph S. Cantarella (husband) and Tanya M. Cantarella (wife). The marriage certificate, however, was twice rejected for registration due to a technical error on the document. After the second rejection, the parties decided not to resubmit the certificate for registration, possibly to avoid the tax consequences of marriage.2 As a result, the 1991 marriage…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reichardt v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Estate of Derrel Depasse v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Argonaut Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Matter of Estate of LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. PetrilliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Sass v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Burnham v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Chaney v. Netterstrom, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Chaney v. NetterstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API