Lavallas v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.
The offense is murder; the punishment assessed by the jury, SO years.
The grounds of error complain: (1) that the evidence is insufficient to support the jury’s finding that the killing was with malice aforethought; (2) that the trial court reversibly erred in admitting a confession of appellant; and (3) that the judgment of conviction is void because two different judges presided, one on the main trial and another at the punishment hearing.
The grounds of error will be considered in reverse order.
Judge Wendell Odom presided at the trial on the issue of guilt.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- McCandless v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Charles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Ely v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Joines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Floyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Hogan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Dahlkoetter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.