Legal Opinion
United States v. Zapata
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 10, 2005No. 02 CR. 1545(VM)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
The United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York (the “Government”) filed a motion in limine by letter dated January 21, 2005 to preclude the admission of a post-arrest statement made by Fabian Londono (“Londono”), an alleged co-conspirator of the defendant, Ingrid Zapata (“Zapata”). Zapata replied to the Government’s motion by letter dated February 2, 2005 arguing that the statement was admissible under general princi,ples of a defendant’s right to a fair trial and Federal Rule of Evidence 807, the residual hearsay exception.
•…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Tome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Tin Yat Chin, AKA Tan C. DauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. MejiaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company v. PACCARDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2024
- State of Iowa v. Jake SkahillSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021
- Turner, Glenn v. Brown, LebbeusDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2019
- United States v. ZapataDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005