Legal Opinion

PRIME PROPERTIES, INC. v. Leahy

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 24, 2010No. 071011594, A138138PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment based on an arbitrator’s award of damages in plaintiffs favor. Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his petition to vacate the arbitration award and the court’s entry of the judgment. He argued to the trial court that, because plaintiffs attorney was represented in an unrelated matter by an attorney in the arbitrator’s law firm, the court was required to vacate the award under ORS 36.705 based on “evident partiality” by the arbitrator. The court ruled that defendant had not made a timely formal objection to the arbitrator’s participation and,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State Ex Rel. Torres v. MasonOregon Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dept. of Human Services v. R. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. Rowen v. GonenneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Wolfston v. Eastside Bend, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. Dept. of Human Services v. B. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. Wissenback v. RussiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API