Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Timm v. Trounce

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1893No. 751PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

The respondent moves to strike portions of the transcript for certain reasons specified, but as the motion presents no points that have not been heretofore decided by the court, it will be denied without setting them forth.

One Peter Timm recovered a judgment against D. Stegman, S. Loeb and John Frazier, in the superior court of Pierce county, and proceedings were instituted supplementary to execution, and this proceeding is founded therein. The appellant was not a party to said suit, but was summoned to appear under §§ 524 and 525, Code Proc.,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Junkin v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State ex rel. Peterson v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State Ex Rel. Gough v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API