Legal Opinion
Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided June 15, 1984No. Civ. A. 84-AR-5131-NWPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ACKER, District Judge.
This action was brought by plaintiff, Samuel Jones, Jr. (Jones), pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 charging that certain of plaintiffs property was wrongfully seized under color of state law by constitutional violation inherent in the attachment procedure. The portion of the complaint here pertinent alleges that the "procedure did not comply with the requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment concerning deprivations of property without due process of law in relation to prejudgment seizures of property”. The alleged constitutional deprivation occurred on April…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jim Beard and Hubbard Beard v. Melvin StephensCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Betty Q. Keasler Rubin v. Marie L. O'KOrenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Brown v. MasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Durr v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Nathan Rodgers Construction & Realty Corp. v. City of Saraland, Alabama, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Samuel Jones, Jr. v. Preuit & MauldinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Jones v. Preuit & MauldinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Jones v. Preuit & MauldinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Jones v. Preuit & MauldinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Jones v. Preuit & MauldinDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.