Legal Opinion
Nick Koretoff v. Tom Vilsack
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 22, 2013No. 12-5075PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
Concurring opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge WILLIAMS.
2Per curiam
Appellants, California almond producers, claim that the Secretary of Agriculture, seeking to prevent the spread of salmonella, exceeded his authority in requiring California almonds sold domestically to be treated with heat or chemicals. The district court granted summary judgment for the Secretary. Finding that appellants have waived their claims by failing to raise them during the rulemaking process, we affirm.
I
Under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, 7 U.S.C. §§ 601-74 (“AMAA”),…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Nuclear Energy Institute, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Advocates for Highway & Auto Safety v. Federal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Edison Electric Institute, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- State of Ohio v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Murphy Exploration & Production Co. v. United States Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by37 opinions
- Hispanic Affairs Project v. R. Alexander AcostaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- American Bankers Association v. National Credit Union AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- State of California v. Alex Azar, IICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- American Forest Resource Council v. AsheDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Banner Health v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.