Legal Opinion

Manzo v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 26, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a consolidated action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff Mario Manzo appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Miller, J.), dated September 17, 2008, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to compel him to submit to an additional physical examination.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to compel the plaintiff Mario Manzo to submit to an additional physical examination is denied.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Audiovox Corp. v. BenyaminiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Schenk v. MaloneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. James v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Gill v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Owen v. LesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Gianacopoulos v. CoronaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Wigand v. ModlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API