Legal Opinion
Sawyer v. Stanley
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 13, 1941No. 7 Div. 623PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice:
This is the second appeal. Stanley v. Sawyer, 237 Ala. 515, 187 So. 425.
The record has been carefully examined and it is thought unnecessary that the main facts be now discussed. They were substantially indicated in the former opinion. The additional evidence induces us to hold that a jury question was presented. The fact that the two handwriting experts by a different course of reasoning arrived at the like result of a forgery does not change the preponderance of the evidence in favor of the result declared in the verdict of the jury and the judgment thereon.
On the former…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hawes v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Sovereign Camp W. O. W. v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Cotton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Vacalis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Garner v. WolfinbargerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Ex Parte GriffithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Exxon Corp. v. DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RES.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- Ex Parte Great Am. Surplus Lines Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.