Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Chicago Housing Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 25, 1985No. 84-1954PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

Plaintiffs, Henry Hubbard and Mary Hubbard, appeal from an order of the trial court dismissing with prejudice their amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Plaintiffs had filed a three-count amended complaint alleging that Henry Hubbard was injured when he came into contact with a hot steam pipe located in his apartment which was owned by the defendant, Chicago Housing Authority. On appeal, plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in dismissing their complaint since they properly pled a cause of action both in negligence and strict products liability.

Count I of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hunt v. BlasiusIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Winnett v. WinnettIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Lowrie v. City of EvanstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. Boddie v. Litton Unit Handling SystemsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. Immergluck v. Ridgeview House, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Vesey v. Chicago Housing AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Martens v. MCL Construction Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. McColgan v. Environmental Control Systems, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Oberg v. ADVANCE TRANSFORMER CO., INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Appleby v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API