Legal Opinion

Mottola v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 24, 1956No. Reap. Dec. 8586; Entry No. 796706, etcPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

These are appeals for reappraisement of the values of badminton rackets, imported from Japan during the period between December 16, 1950, and January 4, 1955. The merchandise was appraised on the basis of export value, defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The appraised value represented the value of the merchandise in a packed condition, f. o. b. port of exportation, which, in all cases, was Yokohama. The value claimed by the plaintiff, also on the basis of export value, is the value ex factory, packed.

The parties have agreed that the sole issue in the case is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Traders Paper Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Steer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  3. United States v. HenryUnited States Customs Court · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mottola v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API