Legal Opinion

Figueroa v. Port Morris Tile & Terrazo Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 26, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered on or about November 4, 1996, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs motion to amend the summons and complaint to name Port Morris Marble as an additional defendant, and implicitly denied Port Morris Tile’s cross motion seeking dismissal of the complaint and all cross claims against it, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss the complaint and all cross claims against Port Morris Tile, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Port Morris Tile & Terrazo Corporation…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Buran v. CoupalNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bracken v. Niagara Frontier Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API