Legal Opinion

People v. Curtiss

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 5, 1970No. Crim. 17222PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GUSTAFSON, J.

The defendant was charged by information with grand theft (in violation of subdivision 3, section 487 of the Penal Code) and with unlawfully taking or driving a vehicle without the consent of the owner (in violation of section 10851 of the Vehicle Code).

The evidence at the preliminary hearing discloses that the defendant rented an automobile for one week. The contract provided that the automobile would not be taken but of the state. Nearly three months after the automobile should have been returned, the defendant was located in Georgia with the car and extradited to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. DisperatiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. People v. RomeroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. De Mond v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. People v. MoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. People v. OrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Landrum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Stockwell v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API