Coffman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · KirshbaumJustice Kirshbaum
In Coffman v. Coffman, 865 P.2d 856 (Colo.App.1993), the court of appeals held that household exclusion clauses in automobile insurance policies remained enforceable subsequent to our decision in Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 689 P.2d 585 (Colo.1984), wherein we determined that such ■ clauses were unenforceable because they were contrary to the public policy of this state. The court of appeals based its decision on the fact that subsequent to our decision in Meyer the General Assembly adopted section 10-4-418(2)(b), 4A C.R.S. (1994), which statute provides…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Schlessinger v. Schlessinger Ex Rel. SchlessingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- People v. HollandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- People v. MacIasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by17 opinions
- Hill v. DeWittSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Brennan v. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- City of Colorado Springs v. PowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. DotsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Academy of Charter Schools v. Adams County School District No. 12Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.