Legal Opinion

May v. Puyallup State Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1923No. 18003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

A meeting of the principal creditors, including the Puyallup State Bank, of the Puyallup & Sumner Fruit Growers Canning Company was held on June 18, 1921, to consider the affairs of the company, which were then in an embarrassed, precarious condition, upon an accountant’s report to the meeting on the affairs of the company. The canning company was-present and participated in the meeting. It was agreed-at the conference that Mr. May, who was present and later appointed receiver of the company, should “go out there and take charge of the assets, funds *281and inventory of the company.” Mr. May did…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kamp v. KampWyoming Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API