Legal Opinion

Pistell v. Wood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 13, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

It is not claimed that this case is not one entitled to a preference under the provisions of rule VIII of the Rules of the Supreme Court, Eighth Judicial District, for Erie County. Appellant’s only complaint relates to the time and manner of claiming the preference. The cause was placed upon the general calendar by the attorneys for defendant about June 2, 1930, no claim being made for a preference until a notice of motion, dated March 16, 1931, was served by defendant’s attorneys, returnable before Part IV (the Calendar Part) on March 23, 1931. Thus it is seen that the case was on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Continental Rubber Works v. Tri-Continental Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bailey v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API