Legal Opinion
Doe v. Division of Probation & Correction Alternatives
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 21, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ralph A. Beisner, J.
Petition pursuant to CPLR article 78 annulling the determination of the Division of Probation and Correction Alternatives which designated petitioner a "sexually violent predator” and for judgment declaring Correction Law § 168 et seq. unconstitutional as applied to petitioner. It is ordered that this petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed.
In 1992 petitioner pleaded guilty to the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree and was sentenced to six months in the Dutchess County Jail and five years’ probation. The period of probation is to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- De Veau v. BraistedSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. SalaamNew York Supreme Court · 1997
- Youngs v. Division of Probation & Correctional Alternatives, New York County Courts1997
- People v. David W.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1999