Roberts v. State

1. In special ground 1 the defendant complains that the court erred in charging the jury upon the subject of admissions because there was no evidence upon 'which to base the charge. It was in evi*193denee that the defendant on the very afternoon before the fire that night “had moved his shirts and things all except his overalls that he painted in [away from the house burned], over to Mr. Hinton’s house; he stated that he intended to stay over at 274 Ransom street, the house burned] and that he intended to take his meals with Mr. Hinton at 297 Pulliam street, and therefore he took his shirts and…