Legal Opinion

Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Rudebeck

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1916No. 13055PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Alston, J., entered December 30, 1914, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Parker, J.-

-The plaintiff bank seeks recovery upon a promissory note, executed and delivered to it by the defendant, and also the foreclosure and sale of collateral which was assigned to it by defendant as security for the payment of the debt evidenced by the note. Trial in the superior court *613resulted in findings and judgment in favor of the plaintiif, from which the defendant has appealed.

The claimed error particularly relied upon by counsel for appellant, and upon which is rested his claimed right to a new trial, is the exclusion by the court of certain testimony sought to be introduced in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scott v. First National Bank of TulsaCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Egede-Nissen v. Crystal Mountain, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API