Legal Opinion

Davis v. Mandau

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 3, 1981No. Nos. 79-2169, 80-197PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANAHY, Judge.

We find no error in the entry of the summary judgments for appellees in this case. For the reasons set forth in Beattie v. Brotz, 391 So.2d 802 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), we reverse the cost order in favor of appellee Evans to the extent that it taxes the costs of copies of depositions.

Pursuant to Article V, Section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution, and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(iv), we certify this decision as being in direct conflict with the decisions of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Sampaio, 374 So.2d 617…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. County of St. Lucie v. BrowningDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. SampaioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  3. Moore v. CaugheyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Beattie v. BrotzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bolton v. BoltonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Davis v. MandauSupreme Court of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API