Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Herbert (Ex parte Indus. Warehouse Servs., Inc.)

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 2, 2018No. 1170013; 1170087Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

MENDHEIM, Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

I agree with the main opinion that the petitions for a writ of mandamus should be granted to direct the trial court to issue a protective order for the bills of lading of Industrial Warehouse Services, Inc. ("IWS"). I would, however, also direct the trial court to issue a protective order for IWS's operations and safety manuals as well. Accordingly, as to that portion of the opinion, I dissent.

IWS sought a protective order as to several operations and safety manuals authored by IWS or purchased from third-party vendors and provided…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Ocwen Federal Bank, FSBSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Ex Parte WigintonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Morgan County Commission v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. Fountain Finance, Inc. v. HinesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Ex Parte EbbersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API