Wilson v. Herbert (Ex parte Indus. Warehouse Servs., Inc.)
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
MENDHEIM, Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I agree with the main opinion that the petitions for a writ of mandamus should be granted to direct the trial court to issue a protective order for the bills of lading of Industrial Warehouse Services, Inc. ("IWS"). I would, however, also direct the trial court to issue a protective order for IWS's operations and safety manuals as well. Accordingly, as to that portion of the opinion, I dissent.
IWS sought a protective order as to several operations and safety manuals authored by IWS or purchased from third-party vendors and provided…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte Ocwen Federal Bank, FSBSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Ex Parte WigintonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Morgan County Commission v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Fountain Finance, Inc. v. HinesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Ex Parte EbbersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.