Legal Opinion

St. John v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 1, 1975No. 8 Div. 549PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Presiding Judge.

Conviction on a three count indictment of drug prescription fraud with general verdict: fifteen years imprisonment.

The indictment in three counts accused appellant and one "Bo” Taylor of obtaining dilaudid, dihydromorphine (Sched. I, § 204(c)(8)) by fraud, deceit, etc., through the use of a forged prescription. The Uniform Controlled Substances Act (Act No. 1407, September 16, 1971, provides in § 403(a)). “It is unlawful for any person: * * * (3) to acquire or obtain possession of a controlled substance by misrepresentation, fraud, forgery, deception or subterfuge * * *…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. Leonard v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Pugh v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. People v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Bohlman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gaston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  2. St. John v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Ragsdale v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Kitsos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  5. Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API