Legal Opinion
United States v. Adam Bros. Farming, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided December 8, 2003No. CV00-07409CASRNBXPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE: CLEAN WATER ACT JURISDICTION •
SNYDER, District Judge.
The Court previously trifurcated the issues to be tried in this case. The first phase which addressed the question of whether jurisdiction exists under the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. (“CWA”) was tried to the Court on February 6, February 7, February 11, February 12, February 13, February 14, February 20, February 26, and February 27, 2003. Thirteen witnesses testified and 136 exhibits were admitted into evidence. H. Michael Semler, Marsha Mann and Lily Chinn appeared for plaintiff…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Roland C. Dubois and Restore: The North Woods v. United States Department of Agriculture, and Loon Mountain Recreation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- United States v. DeatonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- San Francisco Baykeeper v. WEST BAY SANITARY DISTRICTDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
- United States v. SweeneyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020