Legal Opinion

Jones v. Fayerweather

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Van Fleet, whose opinion is reported in Jones v. Davenport, 18 Stew. Eq. 77. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Beasley, C. J.

In the month of January, 1885, William L. Jones, now deceased, exhibited his bill in the court of chancery as a creditor of the firm of Davenport Brothers against Maria Davenport, individually, and as executrix of James S. Davenport, deceased, who, it was alleged, at the time of his death, was a member of such firm. It being shown that James S. Davenport and the partnership of which he was a member were insolvent, the object of the procedure was to subject to the claims of creditors certain real and personal estate which it was charged…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Edmeston v. LydeNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
  2. M'Dermutt v. StrongNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
  3. Clark v. HallNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
  4. Sprague v. GrahamNew York Court of Chancery · 1842

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Young v. WeberNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  2. Central-Penn, Bank v. N.J. FidelityNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  3. Crandol v. GarrisonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  4. Riddle v. CellaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API