Legal Opinion

Informal Opinion No.

New York Attorney General Reports

Decided March 9, 1983Published

1Opinion of the Court

George A. O'Hanlon, Esq. Village Attorney, Port Chester

You have referred to our informal opinion No. 81-87, which concluded that under certain circumstances a boot or locking device may be utilized to immobilize a vehicle in violation of local parking regulations. Your questions are whether a twenty-five dollar fee may be charged for removal of the boot; how the fee is to be allocated in the local budget; and whether the fee must be returned if the defendant is acquitted of the traffic infraction.

In Informal Opinion No. 81-87, we cited the authority of villages under the Vehicle and Traffic…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Buffalo v. . StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Remm v. LandrieuDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1976
  3. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Cohen v. City of New YorkCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API