Legal Opinion

Forsythe v. Leydon

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 2004No. 04-308PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Ariadne Leydon appeals from the District Court’s grant of a new trial to Robyn Forsythe. We reverse.

¶2 We restate the issue on appeal as follows:

¶3 Did the District Court lack jurisdiction to grant Forsythe’s motion for a new trial outside of the 60-day deadline mandated by Rule 59(d), M.R.Civ.P.?

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶4 Forsythe brought this action against Leydon for injuries arising out of a car accident. After a jury trial and special verdict allocating negligence 50/50, Forsythe moved for the District Court to grant her a new trial. Forsythe withdrew her initial motion, but…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Mental Health of K.G.F.Montana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Associated Press v. CroftsMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Johnson v. Eagles Lodge Aerie 3913Montana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Kelly v. Sell & Sell Paint ContractorsMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Marriage of RichardsMontana Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. BNSF Railway Co. v. CringleMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Green v. Gerber Stockton OilMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. In re T.W.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In Re TWMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. ABC Collectors, Inc. v. BirnelMontana Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API