Legal Opinion

Miller v. Merrell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 20, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Witmer, J.

The basic question presented on this appeal is whether the defendant, who stood in a fiduciary relationship with his brother and the two plaintiffs, can be declared to be a con*129structive trustee for them and himself of real property purchased by him but in which none of them previously held an interest and toward the purchase price of which none of the others contributed. We answer in the affirmative. An understanding of this case requires a review of some of the family history of the parties.

Plaintiffs are brothers and are first cousins of defendant, Edgar S. K.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Sharp v. KosmalskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Wendt v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Penato v. GeorgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Augustine v. SzwedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Vincent v. VincentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Interstate Properties v. Pyramid Co. of UticaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API