Robinson v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1DissentWhitham, Justice
I respectfully dissent in part and concur in part. In my view, appellant’s conviction of solicitation is void because it is based upon a fundamentally defective indictment that fails to charge an offense under section 15.03(a) of the Texas Penal Code. Therefore, I would sustain appellant’s second point of error, reverse the trial court’s judgment of conviction of solicitation of capital murder in cause number 05-87-01281-CR and order the indictment in that cause dismissed. I concur that the trial court’s judgment of conviction for arson in number 05-87-01282-CR be affirmed.
As to my dissent, I…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- American Plant Food Corporation v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Hobbs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Schwenk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Majid v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986