Legal Opinion

In re Weinstock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 9, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The petition, dated March 5, 1997, contains four charges of professional misconduct against the respondent. The Special Referee sustained all four charges. The Grievance Committee now moves to confirm the Special Referee’s report. The respondent has submitted an affirmation in response suggesting that, under the circumstances, “resort to the sternest and most stringent form of private discipline” is uniquely appropriate.

The four charges are predicated upon a common set of factual allegations.

The respondent has been a member of the Family Court Assigned Counsel Plan for the…

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. In re IsaacAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API