Legal Opinion

Efentakis v. S/T World Legion

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided April 16, 1958No. Adm. Nos. 334, 402, Civ. No. 475PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTER E. HOFFMAN, District Judge.

In each of these actions certain respondents (defendants) filed a special appearance and motion to quash the service of process. Prior to any determination of such issue, libellants (plaintiff) filed a request for admission of facts and genuineness of documents. In response thereto, respondents (defendant) answered without reserving their rights under the special appearance previously noted, and without first demanding a ruling on the motion to quash. Does such an answer constitute a general appearance which is tantamount to a waiver of the special appearance…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Merchants Heat & Light Co. v. J. B. Clow & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Reynolds Jamaica Mines, Ltd. v. La Societe Navale CaennaiseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  3. CITIZENS'SAV. & TR. CO. v. Illinois Cent. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Grable v. KillitsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  5. Citizens' Savings & Trust Co. v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. David Neifeld v. Meyer Steinberg. David Neifeld v. Meyer SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  2. Speir v. Robert C. Herd & Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1960
  3. Nolan v. JensenDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1959
  4. Savas v. John C.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API