Legal Opinion

David Lee Thompson v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided December 1, 1998No. 2550974PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIS, Judge.

Upon appeal from his conviction for forcible anal sodomy, in violation of Code § 18.2-67.1, David Lee Thompson contends that the trial court erroneously granted the Commonwealth’s motion in limine, prohibiting him from cross-examining the victim concerning her allegedly false statement about prior sexual acts. We find no error and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

I. BACKGROUND

At the time of the incident on trial, the victim was thirteen years old. She and her two younger siblings stayed at their grandmother’s house while their mother was at work. Thompson, the victim’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clinebell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  2. Clark v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
  3. Currie v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bass v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. BeverlySuffolk County Circuit Court · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. DurhamNorfolk County Circuit Court · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. MorrisSpotsylvania County Circuit Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API