Legal Opinion

In Re Neville

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided January 30, 2002No. 06-00-00168-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice CORNELIUS.

In this will contest, Charles Neville and Paulette Knapp appeal from the trial court’s judgment which held that Verdie Neville did not have testamentary capacity on July 9, 1998, at the time she signed a will, and ordered that a will Verdie Neville executed in 1992 should be admitted to probate instead of her 1998 will. Charles Neville and Knapp contend that the evidence is factually and legally insufficient to support the trial court’s finding that Ver-die Neville lacked testamentary capacity when she executed the will of July 9, 1998.

In order to make…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Croucher v. CroucherTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Lee v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Horton v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Carr v. RadkeyTexas Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Evans v. Allen, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
  2. In the Estate of Cornes, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005
  3. in Re: Estate of Evelyn Marie Reno, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
  4. Charkita L. Johnson-Moss v. Freddie M. Pullum and Teresa E. Pullum, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
  5. Estate of Raul Humberto Ayala, Sr.Texas Supreme Court · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API