State v. May
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Reno District Court. February 6, 1893, May was convicted of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors. He appeals. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
AlleN, J.:
The defendant was charged in two counts with unlawful sales of intoxicating liquors, and, in the third count, with keeping a nuisance. He was convicted under the first and third counts. The first complaint is, that the third count of the information was amended after the jury had been sworn, by inserting the words, “and maintained by said defendant, L. R. May.” We think the amendment was an immaterial one, and that the offense was sufficiently charged without it. It was admitted on the trial that the defendant sold “hop tea” and “B. B.” in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Intoxicating-Liquor CasesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Forbes v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
3Cited by8 opinions
- De Graff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Daniel v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Lightle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.