Legal Opinion

State v. May

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Reno District Court. February 6, 1893, May was convicted of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors. He appeals. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

AlleN, J.:

The defendant was charged in two counts with unlawful sales of intoxicating liquors, and, in the third count, with keeping a nuisance. He was convicted under the first and third counts. The first complaint is, that the third count of the information was amended after the jury had been sworn, by inserting the words, “and maintained by said defendant, L. R. May.” We think the amendment was an immaterial one, and that the offense was sufficiently charged without it. It was admitted on the trial that the defendant sold “hop tea” and “B. B.” in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Intoxicating-Liquor CasesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Forbes v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. De Graff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Daniel v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  5. Lightle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API