Legal Opinion
Martinez-Urrutia v. Szetela
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 15, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYesawich Jr., J.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this Court pursuant to Education Law § 6510 [5]) to review a determination of respondent which revoked petitioner’s license to practice psychology in New York.
After hearing testimony from one of petitioner’s former patients (hereinafter H.F.), petitioner and his wife, a panel of the State Board of Psychology (hereinafter the Hearing Panel) found petitioner guilty of two specifications of misconduct as a result of his having become involved in a sexual relationship with H.F. while she was his patient (see, 8 NYCRR 29.1 [b] [5]; 29.12 [a] [2]…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Block v. AmbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Warder v. Board of RegentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Carrera v. SobolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- MATTER OF CARRERA v. SobolNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Rojas v. SobolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gonzalez v. New York State Department of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Kole v. New York State Education DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Gold v. DeBuonoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Cohan v. Duncan-PoitierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999