Tidewater Plumbing Supply Co. v. Emory Foundry Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Prentis, P.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
When first presented, the petition for a writ of error in this ease was refused by ea'eh of the judges of this court, but upon the filing of an amended petition, and in response to the earnest persistence of the attorney for the petitioner, the writ was granted.
The record presents no novel questions. We shall, therefore, content ourselves with making a brief statement of the controlling facts, and citing some of the authorities in which the legal principles involved have been fully and sufficiently expounded.
The pertinent facts are, that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alleghany Iron Co. v. TeafordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
- Norfolk Hosiery & Underwear Mills v. Aetna Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- Richmond Leather Manufacturing Co. v. FawcettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- Worrell v. Kinnear Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1905
- A. I. M. Percolating Corp. v. Ferrodine Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Goldstein v. Old Dominion Peanut Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1941
- SI International Technology Services, Inc. v. National Technologies Associates, Inc.Fairfax County Circuit Court · 2006