Legal Opinion

Tate v. University Medical Center of Southern Nevada

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 25, 2010No. 09-16505PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Concurrence by

Judge PAEZ.

ORDER

We must decide whether we have jurisdiction to review the district court’s refusal to enjoin a hospital to reinstate a surgeon when he has since lost all of his clinical privileges at the hospital.

I

James Tate, MD, is a board-certified general surgeon who was granted clinical privileges at University Medical Center (“UMC”) by the Medical & Dental Staff of University Medical Center (“Staff”). UMC and Dr. Tate then entered into a Trauma Services Agreement, by which UMC employed Dr. Tate as a surgeon on the trauma on-call schedule. In August, 2008, however, UMC…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Group, Inc. v. City of BeaumontCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Meredith v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Stears v. Sheridan County Memorial Hospital Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  4. Di Giorgio v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tate v. UNIVERSITY MED. CENTER OF S. NEV.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Richard Tate v. University Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API