Legal Opinion
Cuellar v. Ford Motor Co.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided September 12, 2006No. 2005AP2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWedemeyer, P.J.
¶ 1. Hilario Cuellar, Jr. and Michael McVicker appeal from a judgment entered after summary judgment dismissing their claim alleging that an "upgrade program," offered by Ford Motor Company ("Ford") to certain vehicle owners, violated the Wisconsin Motor Vehicle Adjustment Programs Act ("MVAPA"). See Wis. Stat. § 218.0172 (2003-04). Cuel-lar and McVicker claim that the trial court erred in ruling that Ford's "upgrade program" did not fall under the MVAPA statute. Because the undisputed facts demonstrate that the upgrade program did constitute an "extended policy program" subject to the MVAPA,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Donaldson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kilian v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Arandell Corp. v. Xcel Energy, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2008
- In Re West. States Wholesale Natural Gas AntitrustDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2008
- JOYCE v. JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025