Legal Opinion

Auvil v. CBS "60 Minutes"

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided June 18, 1992No. CS-90-553-RJMPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WM. FREMMING NIELSEN, District Judge.

All motions then pending were resolved by Order entered June 5, 1992 save for the motion to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment brought by the Natural Resources Defense Council [NRDC] and Fenton Communications. In the interest of economy, that Order is incorporated by reference. Suffice it to say that on February 26, 1989 CBS “60 Minutes” aired a televised report on Alar, a growth regulator used most commonly on apples and suspected of being a potent carcinogen. That incident provoked what has come to be known as the “Alar Scare.”…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Kimerli Jayne Pring v. Penthouse International, Ltd., a New York Corporation, and Philip CioffariCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  3. Barger v. Playboy Enterprises, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1983
  4. Salomone v. MacMillan Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. Auvil v. CBS "60 Minutes"District Court, E.D. Washington · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Auvil v. CBS "60 Minutes"Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Auvil v. CBS 60 MinutesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API