Legal Opinion

Lamb v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 28, 1912No. 1636PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HARPER, Judge.

—Appellant was indicted for forgery and passing

a forged instrument, there being two counts in the indictment. The alleged forged instrument is as follows:

“Rusk, Texas, April 1, 1911. Ho. 17.
“The First Hational Bank of Rusk, Texas.

Pay to the order of Been Richert $50.75

' Fifty Cents and 75/100 Dollars.

Knox Overton.”

The indictment contains no explanatory averments, alleging for what amount the check was intended. The statute reads that any person is guilty of forgery who, with intent to defraud, shall make any false instrument in writing, purporting to he the act of another, in…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Keagan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. McNeese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API