Legal Opinion

Coy A. Morgan v. The Stanley Works, a Foreign Corporation, and Stanley Magic-Door Systems, Inc., a Foreign Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 16, 1988No. 87-1865UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

857 F.2d 1475

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

Coy A. MORGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

The STANLEY WORKS, a foreign corporation, and Stanley

Magic-Door Systems, Inc., a foreign corporation,

Defendants-Appellants.

No. 87-1865.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 16, 1988.

Before ENGEL, Chief Circuit Judge, MILBURN, Circuit Judge, and DAVID D. DOWD,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Wilbur L. LOVELACE, Appellant, v. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  5. Matras v. Amoco Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitch Goree v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
  2. Electronic Planroom, Inc. v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API