Legal Opinion

Railway Exp. Agency v. Hoagland

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 19, 1952PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

62 So.2d 756 (1952)

RAILWAY EXP. AGENCY, Inc.

v.

HOAGLAND.

Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc.

December 19, 1952.

Rehearing Denied February 9, 1953.

Ausley, Collins & Truett, Tallahassee, and Mizell & Carmichael, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

J. Luther Drew, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

MATHEWS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a final judgment in a suit filed to recover damages by reason of the damage by fire of some merchandise shipped to the appellee at West Palm Beach, Florida. Because of the conclusion which we have reached it is unnecessary to discuss the evidence or the details of the case…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gulf Appliance Distributors v. LongSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  2. Sudduth Realty Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  3. Hancock v. HancockSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  4. Moore v. FletcherSupreme Court of Florida · 1947

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Adams Engineering Co. v. Construction Products Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1963
  2. Hoagland v. Railway Express AgencySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  3. Allen v. GaitherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  4. Davant v. Coachman Properties, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  5. Miller v. Hartley's, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API