Speare v. Troy Laundry Machinery Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
■ Appeal by the defendant, The Troy Laundry Machinery Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 27th day of July, 1899, denying its motioti, to change the place of trial of the action.
1Opinion of the Court
Van Brunt, P. J.:
Under the rule laid down in the case of Rossie Iron Works v. Westbrook (59 Hun, 345), the residence of the defendant was in the city of Troy, Rensselaer county, State of New York. It is a domestic corporation, and it appears that its' principal office and place of business is in' said city. The plaintiff is a non-resident. Consequently, the defendant, as a matter of right, is entitled to a change of Venue. Some suggestions have been made that for certain reasons the trial should not take place in the city of Troy, and the case of Duche v. Buffalo Grape Sugar Company (63 How.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rossie Iron-Works v. WestbrookNew York Supreme Court · 1891
- Duche v. Buffalo Grape Sugar Co.New York Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by7 opinions
- Poland v. United Traction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Dairymen's League Co-Operative Ass'n v. BrundoNew York Supreme Court · 1927
- Remington & Sherman Co. v. Niagara County National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Page Belting Co. v. JosephNew York Supreme Court · 1928
- Stoddard v. ManzellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.