Legal Opinion

Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. Law

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 2, 2009No. 19-30264Published

1Opinion of the Court

570 F.3d 574 (2009)

CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,

v.

Wan E. LAW; Sie L. Tsu, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants.

No. 08-20159.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 2, 2009.

Ronald Edwin Tigner, Gregory S. Hudson (argued), Joseph Anthony Ziemianski, Cozen O'Connor, Houston, TX, for Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London.

Daniel Farris Crowder (argued), Beck & Crowder, Houston, TX, for Wan E. Law and Sie L. Tsu.

Before O'CONNOR, Associate Justice (Ret.),[*] and WIENER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

WIENER, Circuit Judge:

Thieves stole copper…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. New Ulm Gas, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. DeWitt County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. ParksTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. R & P Enterprises v. LaGuarta, Gavrel & Kirk, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API