Legal Opinion

Erie R. v. Kazanecki

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 29, 1925No. 3342PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

The child in this ease went upon a track of the defendant railroad company and was injured. After suit he had the judgment to which this writ of error is directed. Except the refusal of the trial court to charge one of its points (which was qualified and in substance already charged and therefore is without error), the defendant (below) raises on this review but two questions: First, whether there was sufficient evidence of permissive use to take the case out of the operation of the general rule of law that a trespasser, though an infant, cannot recover for an injury…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kay v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  2. Manhattan Life Ins. v. WarwickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1871
  3. Henderson v. Continental Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Millum v. Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. O'Leary v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reasoner v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  2. Estate of Zimmerman v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API