Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. Bleecker-Thompson Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtS. Samuel Di Falco, J.

Upon the foregoing papers this motion to direct plaintiff to post security for costs is granted. Plaintiff’s attempt to show that he resides in New York City falls far short of the proof necessary to establish that fact for *713the purpose of this application. The mere keeping of a mailing address is not sufficient in the face of plaintiff’s statement that he has been working in New Jersey for several months and has apparently also lived there for that period. While plaintiff claims an intent to return to New York, there is no certainty that he will actually do so. The statute governing this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morek v. SmolakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  2. Harshbarger v. Sherron Metallic Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Myers v. CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Slutzky v. Aron Estates Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Manning v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API