Legal Opinion

Wilson v. McKenna

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 4, 2016No. 15-3496PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-appellant Alvin Wilson, proceeding pro se, appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Corrections Officer Brooke McKenna in his suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging deliberate indif*752ference to Ms medical needs. The district court granted summary judgment to McKenna, concluding, inter alia, that Wilson had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, procedural history, and issues on appeal.

As an initial matter, Wilson does not address exhaustion in his appellate brief, and therefore has abandoned any…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Ross v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Frank X. Losacco v. City of Middletown, Sebastian J. Garafalo, George Aylward, Joseph Bibisi, John Chowaniec, and Relford WardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. Williams v. Correction Officer PriatnoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  5. Garcia v. Hartford Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. (PC) Carroll v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  2. (PC) Green v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  3. (PC) Hart v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. (PC) Stith v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  5. Burrell v. AnnucciDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2025

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API